LOGGING VS. PALM OIL: DISCUSS

The results of the study were published in Science on January 10, 2025 (details at end). If you had to choose between a logged rain forest and one turned over to a palm oil plantation, which would be better for biodiversity?

The main part of the answer is that as long as the logging is selective (as shown, right), a logged forest can still retain and restore a lot of biodiversity, which defeats the arguments of those who want to say that once it’s logged it might as well be turned over to plantation of, say, palm oil. So the conservation implications of having accurate insight on this subject are huge.

In the study, the researchers looked at over 80 metrics describing multiple aspects of the structure, biodiversity, and functioning of the tropical forest ecosystem – from soil nutrients and carbon storage, to photosynthesis rates and numbers of bird and bat species. These were measured in study sites in three areas of Sabah, Malaysian Borneo that were either in undisturbed old growth forest, logged forest (moderately or heavily logged), or in previous logged forests that had been converted to oil palm plantation.

The research, unprecedented in investigating such a broad spectrum of indicators for the health of tropical forest ecosystems in a single analysis, was made possible due to the wide range of study sites established and maintained  by the South East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership. 

In total, logging and conversion had widespread impacts, affecting most of the measured properties - 60 of the 82 ecosystem metrics. However, there were clear differences between the two.

In general, logging mostly impacted factors associated with forest structure and environment. Since logging in the tropics is generally selective - focusing on trees with particular commercial qualities - even low levels of logging alter the system. For example, when older, larger trees are removed, this creates gaps in the canopy, enabling rapid-growing species to emerge that have very different characteristics, including less dense wood and thinner leaves that are more vulnerable to herbivores.

Converting these logged forests to oil palm plantations, however, has greater impacts on biodiversity that go beyond those of logging alone. Species of birds, bats, dung beetles, trees, vines, and soil microorganisms all showed greater reductions in abundance and diversity on plantations compared with logged forests. This is likely due in part to the major changes in plant food resources and the shift to hotter and drier microclimates under the single layer of oil palm that follows conversion from logged forest. 

According to the study team, this demonstrates that logged forest can still be valuable for maintaining biodiversity and should not be immediately ‘written off’ for conversion to oil palm plantations. 

Professor Ed Turner (University of Cambridge), who co-led the study, said: ‘A key message of this work is that old growth, intact forests are unique, but secondary logged forests are also valuable and important in terms of their biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relative to the much-reduced levels seen in oil palm plantations. ’

One surprise for the research team was how variable the responses were. Dr Charlie Marsh (Department of Biology, University of Oxford at the time of the study, now National University of Singapore), lead author of the study, said: ‘Our study demonstrates that focussing on any single component of the ecosystem may lead to incomplete understanding of how the ecosystem responds as a whole. We were really surprised by the huge variability in how different facets of the ecosystem responded to deforestation. We saw increases, decreases, or sometimes no change at all. There were even aspects that would increase in logged forest, only to decrease in oil palm plantations. When making decisions concerning land management and conservation, we must consider a broad suite of ecological properties.’